True to form, the New York Times article on the debate (calling Vance ‘dominant’) was published way before the debate had even concluded.

    by GonzoVeritas

    21 Comments

    1. Independent_Annual52 on

      Not even hiding they are hacks through subliminal subversion anymore. Just screaming from the high-rise ivory towers now

    2. AnonAmbientLight on

      The media really needs this horse race for the ratings.

      I can’t tell if they think or hope that Harris will just win in a land slide, or if they just don’t give a flying fuck.

    3. Douthat is a conservative opinion columnist… let’s not trash the whole NYT because this guy has bad takes

    4. BagelandShmear48 on

      This is the same newspaper that praised Nasrallah as a great orator who wants equality for all.

      Hardly surprised on their take on the debate.

    5. Well, it’s Douchehat. He probably wrote it and had it in the can before the debate, then added a few small details to look like he actually watched it.

    6. I saw on Instagram today that the Times also posted something about Vance dominating the debate, and a lot of people commented on that with “We must’ve watched a completely different debate because what did you guys smoke?”

    Leave A Reply