A lot of these look like they just got out of the shower and took a pic……..also, has a british feel to it as well.
goodie_gumdrop on
bottom left 👀
cricket_bacon on
I don’t see the *Dorothy Hamill*.
Anxious_Egg1268 on
2nd to the left, 2nd to bottom is my fav
The_River_Is_Still on
Really, except some slight variations and color highlights it hasn’t changed too much.
Everything comes back around, just slightly altered. Looks from the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s for the most part all come back in some way. Same with most clothes.
just-why_ on
Looks more like one of the hairstyle books at salon.
Emergency_Marzipan68 on
Uma Thurman 3rd column 2nd row?
Lutzoey on
Editor of a magazine called SEVENTEEN: “Make them seemingly naked for these for no apparent reason”
Tearsofgalatea on
The wet look is giving
RoboNerdOK on
Those styles look like a LOT of work.
rodbrs on
I’m impressed with the difference in volume of some of these. E.g. the before and after pic 1 row up from bottom left.
12 Comments
A lot of these look like they just got out of the shower and took a pic……..also, has a british feel to it as well.
bottom left 👀
I don’t see the *Dorothy Hamill*.
2nd to the left, 2nd to bottom is my fav
Really, except some slight variations and color highlights it hasn’t changed too much.
Everything comes back around, just slightly altered. Looks from the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s for the most part all come back in some way. Same with most clothes.
Looks more like one of the hairstyle books at salon.
Uma Thurman 3rd column 2nd row?
Editor of a magazine called SEVENTEEN: “Make them seemingly naked for these for no apparent reason”
The wet look is giving
Those styles look like a LOT of work.
I’m impressed with the difference in volume of some of these. E.g. the before and after pic 1 row up from bottom left.
“Seventeen” magazine with all topless pics?
Good thing most are 30, by the looks of it.