Efficiency

    by RickyRacer2020

    43 Comments

    1. Soujourner3745 on

      Until you’re drunk one time and you pee in the sink and wash your hands in the urinal.

    2. Pardon the industrial design OCD, but it’s less efficient, not practical, and a waste of materials. People don’t want to wait even longer to pee. People don’t care if they have to wait to wash their hands if they even decide to wash them at all. And you don’t need four separate sinks to install multiple faucets when you could install a perfectly fine trough style sink with multiple faucets. Denver airport understands this.

      Sorry. Rant over.

    3. a_cat_named_larry on

      When you’re done washing your hands, you can turn the faucet off with the piss handle.

    4. It’s hilarious how most of you are missing the point. It’s for the sink water to be recycled to flush the toilet. It has nothing to do with multitasking.

    5. I want to say ai to this picture. Different holes on the sinks, strange faucet on some of them and so on.

    6. Fickle_Library8115 on

      Its for washing your feet lots of arabic countries have them , cuz who’s junk is that low

    7. CapitalLower4171 on

      Why tf is one round? There is so much about this that doesn’t make any sense already, but why is one round?

    8. juddlesnpuddles on

      I’m guessing there aren’t sinks in the stalls. Imagine reaching around someone taking a piss at the urinal to wash your hands lol

    9. Not efficient at all, now I gotta wait to take a piss because someone needs to wash their hands.

    10. Phht I got a deep sink in the garage, the nearest bathroom is 30 feet away… Do the math.

    11. That’s not efficient. At the local stadium there’s a room with 40 urinals, 3 stalls and 3 sinks. There’s a line for the urinals but not for the sinks.

      You do the math on how that’s working out.

    Leave A Reply