Boy did that backfire

    by Commercial-Strain-39

    17 Comments

    1. Yeah, but the Germans did the same thing to them after the Franco-Prussian War. I agree it wasn’t the smartest thing to do since it just assures that the losers will be pissed enough that they’ll want revenge, but when have people (especially government officials) been smart about these things?

    2. My man doesn’t know how hard Germany was against their ennemies… Russia got destroyed in 1917, France was humiliated in 1871, Germany did not get punished enough in 1919.

    3. PM_ME_UR__ELECTRONS on

      Not strict enough considering what they did to Belgium.

      More to the point, the British, French, and Americans all had conflicting ideas on how to prevent a future war; the British were more for leniency, the French (quite understandably) more for reparations and the Americans more for self-determination among countries in the former German and Austrian empires. Reasonably enough, all of these powers had their say at Versailles, and parts of each of their plans were implemented, but as a result, none of their plans was able to do its job. Perhaps any one of them would have.

      Not to mention that there was literally no other way to pay for the damage caused by the Germans in Belgium and northern France, as WWI had no “Marshall plan”.

    4. Policies so strict the German could just not respect it and when the French tried to enforce it everyone loses their minds and blamed the french.

      Stop regurgating pre-war german/nazi propaganda. the Versailles treaty had far more problem than just being too “strict”/”harsh” or not enough. And most of it came from a lack of commitment to it for all parties involved.

    5. the_battle_bunny on

      Versailles was so harsh it didn’t prevent Germany rearming itself and going for Round 2.
      It took literal dismemberment of Germany in the aftermath of WW2 to finally kill off German militarism.

      In reality, no treaty other than one acknowledging a total German victory would prevent German revanchism. That’s because German population was spoonfed propaganda about impending and certain victory. German capitulation in 1918 was sudden, unexpected and seemed completely inexplicable. After all, Germany was winning on all fronts.

    6. Neoliberal_Nightmare on

      *France: Well that was a fucking disaster. I want compensation. I want reparations. I want the Rhineland. It’s going to be 1919 all over again, fuck the inevitable backlash.*

    7. Agile-Lifeguard709 on

      >!WHY DON’T YOU CENSOR FR*NCE, ARE YOU STUPID, YOUR PIPI WILL BE BLOWN UP IN 30S, RUN!<

    8. No the most powerful factor for the rise of the nazis was the economic crisis of 29. It’s common knowledge now i think.

    9. CryptographerFun6557 on

      Not to mention the reason it was signed was that the Allies manufactured a famine after the war ended and killed hundreds of thousands of Germans through starvation. The treaty was far too harsh for the Allies never stepping foot in Germany.

    10. Proud_Shallot_1225 on

      It is simply because the United States prevented us from imposing heavier war tributes and from dismembering the German Empire in full state.

    11. As with all things in history, they were a factor but not the sole cause.

      Equally you could say the financial crash in 1929 of wall street was to blame.

    12. Chairman_Ender on

      They should’ve either actually enforced the Versailes or replaced the economic costs with further disarmment.

    Leave A Reply