The whole “if men didn’t exist, who would protect you” conversation played out on twitter

    by CapAccomplished8072

    21 Comments

    1. Complete_Rest6842 on

      We doing the : women aren’t violent thing?”cuz man…history tells us a bit diff…

    2. Jaded_Heat9875 on

      This young man is living in his “ideal” world of male dominance…can anyone get him out????!!!

    3. I know some women who I would pick over most men, if shit got bad. Most of the women I know don’t need protecting.

    4. So the logic is “we need men to protect us from violence from other women” as if that is not also violence against women?

    5. RockyMntnView on

      Okay but men DON’T protect women from other women, even on the rare occasion when a fight happens. They stand back, cheering & jeering. So what now?

    6. Private_HughMan on

      Also, why couldn’t women provide protection to women? It’s not as if the major size and strength discreptancy would still be in play. If a woman can be a threat to a woman, why can’t a woman protect a woman? Gaps will still exist but they’d be MUCH narrowed. Plus, women tend to be much less violent, anyway.

    7. solitarytrees2 on

      It’s such a garbage argument too because I know so many men who won’t step in when women get attacked by a woman. Like what are you going to do, put your hands up, say “mom told me never to hit a woman”, and watch? Wonderful protection.

    8. legionofdoom78 on

      That’s what guns are for you big goof.  It’s the great equalizer between men being violent towards women.  

    9. toooooold4this on

      Women usually fight each other because of men, so I’m thinking if there were no men, women probably wouldn’t fight all that often, either.

    10. JustHere_toWatch on

      Lesbian relationships are more violent than heterosexual ones. It’s not too much of a stretch to assume that rates of violence against women by women would also increase.

    Leave A Reply